University of Kansas Ombuds Office
Table of Contents
II. Purpose and Scope of the Ombuds Office
III. Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics
Authority and Limits of the Ombuds Office
B. Limitations on Authority of the Ombuds Office
VI. Office Structure
VII. Evaluation of the Ombuds Office and Staff
VIII. Procedures for Revisions and Amendment of this Document
Appendix A. Professional Standards of Practice
Appendix B. Professional Code of Ethics
Note: This document is the result of collaboration and feedback from the following individuals: Kellie Harmon, Maria Orive, and Steve Grabow, University Ombuds Office, University of Kansas; University General Counsel, University of Kansas; Bill Crowe and Rick Levy, University Senate Executive Committee, University of Kansas; Mary Lee Hummert, Provost Office, University of Kansas; Margo Wesley, Director & Ombudsperson, University of California, Berkeley, & the University of California Ombuds Offices for providing a template; Tom Kosakowski, Ombudsperson, Claremont Graduate University; Judith Bruner, Director & Ombudsperson, University of California, San Diego; Tom Sebok, Director and University Ombuds, University of Colorado, Boulder; Sean Banks, Director and Company Ombuds, Shell Oil Company; Janis Schonauer, Ombudsman, AllianceBernstein L.P. and IOA President.
This document defines and clarifies the highest standards and best practices in the Ombuds profession, as they apply within the context of the University of Kansas and its Ombuds Office. This document is consistent with the International Ombudsman Association (“IOA”) Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics and is not a statement of KU policy or Senate Code. In this document, “Ombuds Office” shall include professional staff (the University Ombuds, the Faculty Ombuds), as well as any support staff.
The intent of this document is to: (1) educate the University community about the role of the Ombuds Office; (2) proactively assist the Ombuds Office to operate in a manner consistent with IOA professional standards, code of ethics, and best practices; (3) discourage activities and actions which do not comply with best practices.
The mission of the University of Kansas Ombuds Office is to ensure that all members of the University community receive fair and equitable treatment. The Ombuds Office carries out its mission by way of two complementary approaches: (1) receiving and attempting to resolve individual grievances on a confidential, informal basis; and 2) supporting procedures that advance the goal of a fair conflict management system.
One purpose of the Ombuds Office is to act as “an ear to the people” so every voice at the University of Kansas can be heard and receive impartial attention without fear of retaliation and loss of privacy. In doing so, the Ombuds Office serves as an independent, confidential, neutral and informal resource to the entire university community.
The terms “ombuds”, “ombudsperson”, or “ombudsman” carry with them certain professional and legal responsibilities, and therefore offices using these terms should follow the longstanding professional tenets outlined in this document; and the University should discourage the use of the title “Ombuds” for those programs which choose not to operate consistently with IOA professional standards.
An Ombuds at the University of Kansas serves as a designated neutral and operates independently of ordinary line and staff structures. The Ombuds Office should not be affiliated with any compliance function of the University. The Ombuds Office shall provide informal dispute resolution, coaching, consultation, and referral services to the entire University community, including faculty, staff, and students, and where appropriate, to others who are associated with the university, i.e. alumni, family members, etc. The Ombuds Office shall be a place where members of the University of Kansas community can seek guidance regarding the addressing or resolution of disputes or concerns through a resource which is confidential, neutral, informal, and independent.
Services of the Ombuds Office do not replace other grievance processes at the University; however, when those procedures have not been utilized or have not been successful, the Ombuds Office works to facilitate communication and assist parties in reaching mutually acceptable, fair and equitable resolutions that are consistent with the ideals and objectives of the University. The Ombuds Office shall also report general trends and provide feedback throughout the organization, and suggest systemic change when appropriate without disclosing confidential communications and information.
The Ombuds Office shall confidentially receive complaints, concerns or inquiries about alleged acts, omissions, improprieties, and/or broader systemic problems. In response, an Ombuds will listen, make informal inquiries or otherwise review matters received, offer options, make referrals, and facilitate communication independently and impartially. In addition, the Ombuds Office shall serve as an information and communication resource, consultant, and catalyst for institutional change within the University community. The Ombuds Office shall also provide a list of available trained faculty mediators per University Senate Rules and Regulations, 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52.
The Ombuds Office, as described in Article VI of the U.S.R.R. (184.108.40.206), shall also make annual reports to the University community at large, summarizing office activity and broadly outlining trends and observations gathered from the year’s activities.
The Ombuds Office acts in accordance with the IOA Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics (attached as Appendices A and B). These tenets require that Ombuds Offices shall function independently within the structure of the organization, shall be confidential and neutral, and shall limit the scope of their services to informal means of dispute resolution. The IOA Standards and Code delineate minimum standards, and the Ombuds Office shall always strive to operate to “best practices” and to manage the Ombuds Office in a way that serves the best interests of the University of Kansas community. The Ombuds Office shall take appropriate steps to make this document and the tenets of best practices of the Ombuds profession available to the University community.
The Ombuds Office shall be, and shall appear to be, free from interference in the legitimate performance of its duties. This independence is achieved primarily through organizational recognition, reporting structure, and neutrality. To ensure objectivity, the Ombuds Office shall operate independently of ordinary line and staff structures. An Ombuds will not disclose confidential information about matters discussed in the Ombuds Office with anyone in the organization, including the person to whom the Ombuds Office reports, except as clearly delineated in Section III. B. The Ombuds Office should report administratively to the Provost Office and to University Senate (see “VI. Office Structure”). In all cases, the Ombuds Office shall have unobstructed access to the Chancellor and the Provost of the University.
The Ombuds Office shall not disclose or be required to disclose any information provided in confidence, unless given permission to do so by the visitor. An exception to maintaining any such confidentiality would include if the University or Faculty Ombuds had a reasonable concern regarding an imminent risk about possible violence or physical harm or where disclosure is required by law. The Ombuds Office asserts that there is a privilege with respect to the identity of visitors and their issues, though Kansas does not recognize this privilege by statute. The Ombuds Office shall not confirm communicating with any party or parties, or disclose any confidential information without the party’s or parties’ express permission provided in the course of discussions with the Ombuds Office, and at the discretion of the Ombuds Office. An Ombuds shall not participate as a witness with respect to any confidential communication, nor shall he/she participate in any formal process inside or outside of the University, unless compelled to do so by judicial subpoena or court order. The Ombuds Office considers communication with the Ombuds Office to be privileged. The privilege belongs to an Ombuds and the Ombuds Office, rather than to any party in an issue. The Ombuds Office considers that others cannot waive this privilege.
An Ombuds is a designated neutral, operating independently in the structure of the University. An Ombuds shall not take sides in any conflict, dispute or issue. An Ombuds advocates for fair and equitably administered processes and not on behalf of a specific individual. An Ombuds is neutral, impartial, and unaligned. An Ombuds should not serve in any additional role, including participation on committees within the University which would compromise the neutrality of an Ombuds. The Ombuds Office should not report to nor be affiliated with any compliance function of the university.
The Ombuds Office shall be a resource for informal dispute resolution. The Ombuds Office shall not investigate, arbitrate, adjudicate or in any other way participate in any internal or external formal process or action. The Ombuds Office does not keep records for the University, and shall not create or maintain documents or records for the University about individual cases. Notes, if any, taken during the course of working on a case should be routinely destroyed at regular intervals. Use of the Ombuds Office is strictly voluntary and is not a required step in any grievance process.
Specific areas of authority and limitations on the authority of the Ombuds Office include those listed below:
The authority and role of the Ombuds Office as well as qualifications for Ombuds staff derives from University Senate Rules and Regulations, Article V., Section 1 and Article VI, Section 2, 6.2.1 – 220.127.116.11
“ARTICLE V. ORGANIZATION FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Section l. University Ombudsman
5.1.1 Appointment. The University Ombudsman shall be appointed by the Chancellor from among a panel of three candidates presented by the Senate Executive Committee.
5.1.2 Ombudsman’s Office. Faculty will be represented in the staffing of the Ombudsman Office through a part time appointment of a faculty member either to the position of Ombudsman or as Assistant Ombudsman.
5.1.3 Term of Office. A faculty member serving in the Ombuds Office shall serve a three-year term. The Ombudsman shall be eligible for reappointment.
5.1.4 Qualifications. The Ombudsman shall possess a comprehensive knowledge of the University organization and procedures and a post-baccalaureate degree. He or she shall, at the time of initial appointment, have completed at least six years of service at the University of Kansas.”
“ARTICLE VI. PROCEDURES FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Section 2. Informal Means of Dispute Resolution
6.2.1 Generally. The collegial atmosphere of the University community is best served through informal compromise resolution of disputes. Thus, before pursuing formal grievance procedures, a grievant should ordinarily attempt to resolve the matter informally through direct or indirect consultation with the other party or through discussions with supervisory personnel.
6.2.2 Ombudsman. The Ombudsman shall be available (a) to receive and attempt to resolve individual grievances of members of the University community; and (b) to recommend procedural changes within the University in response to experience acquired in investigating individual cases.
18.104.22.168 Powers. The Ombudsman shall have access to all administrative officials of the University and, in accordance with law, to all University records, including those of faculty members. He or she shall not have authority to take disciplinary action, reverse decisions, or circumvent existing University rules and procedures. He or she shall supplement, not replace, other means, where they exist, for redress of grievances. All proceedings in individual cases shall be held confidential by the Ombudsman unless otherwise authorized by the complainant.
22.214.171.124 Reports. The Ombudsman shall at least annually make reports to the University community at large.”
The University or Faculty Ombuds shall be entitled to inquire about any issue concerning the University which affects any member of the University community, and shall respect the confidentiality of that information. The University or Faculty Ombuds shall have access to all records and personnel of the University of Kansas, for the purpose of performing his/her duties unless such records are privileged under Kansas or federal law. An Ombuds has the authority to break confidence if an Ombuds believes there is an imminent risk of serious harm.
An Ombuds may, without having received a specific complaint from a member of the University community, inquire about matters which he/she believes to warrant attention.
The Ombuds Office may decline to inquire into a matter or may withdraw its services from a visitor if an Ombuds believes involvement is inappropriate for any reason, including, but not limited to, matters not brought in good faith, a conflict of interest, or matters which appear to be a misuse of the Ombuds function.
An Ombuds has the authority to discuss a range of options available to the visitor, including both informal and formal procedures.
The Ombuds Office may require legal or other professional advice in order to fulfill its required functions. In the event that the Ombuds Office is asked for documents or testimony related to any litigation or other formal process, or when any other conflict of interest arises between the Ombuds Office, the administration, or General Counsel of the University of Kansas, the Ombuds Office may be provided legal counsel independent from the University through the Office of the Kansas Attorney General.
Communication to the Ombuds Office shall not constitute notice to the University. The Ombuds Office shall publicize its non-notice role to the university community. This includes allegations that may be perceived to be violations of laws, regulations or policies, such as sexual harassment, issues covered by the Whistleblower policy, or incidents subject to reporting under the Clery Act. Since the Ombuds Office is informal, off-the-record, confidential, and independent, an Ombuds is not required to report allegations to the University. If a visitor would like to put the University on notice regarding a specific situation, or wishes for information to be provided to the University, an Ombuds will provide the visitor with information and refer the visitor to an official who represents the University so that the visitor may do so himself/herself.
The Ombuds Office shall not address any issues arising under a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”), unless allowed by specific language in the CBA (e.g., Kansas Association of Public Employees (KAPE)). This means that while the Ombuds Office may provide services to union members, those services may not include addressing issues that are covered in the CBA, including, but not limited to, issues such as grievable claims for termination of employment or formal discipline. In those cases, an Ombuds shall refer the employee to the CBA and to their union representative.
The Ombuds Office shall not conduct formal investigations of any kind. An Ombuds shall also not participate in formal dispute processes or outside agency complaints or lawsuits, either on behalf of a visitor to the Ombuds Office or on behalf of the University, subject to compliance with a judicial subpoena or court order. Because confidentiality and informality are critically important to the Ombuds Office, all communications with an Ombuds are made with the understanding that communication is confidential, off-the-record, and that no one from the Ombuds Office will be called to testify as a witness in any formal or legal proceeding to reveal confidential communications, unless compelled by judicial subpoena or court order. The Ombuds Office provides an alternate channel for dispute resolution, and all use of ombuds services shall be voluntary.
The Ombuds Office does not keep records for the University, and shall not create or maintain documents or records for the University about individual cases. Notes, if any, taken during the course of working on a case shall be routinely destroyed at regular intervals. All materials related to a case should be maintained in a secure location and manner, and should be destroyed once the case is concluded. An Ombuds may maintain non-confidential statistical data to assist an Ombuds in reporting trends and providing feedback to the University.
Due to confidentiality concerns, the University Ombuds Office discourages the use of e-mail to communicate with visitors. If anyone wishes to communicate with an Ombuds via e-mail, confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. The University Ombuds Office will delete e-mail correspondence on a regular basis.
An Ombuds shall not act as an advocate for any party in a dispute, nor shall it represent management or visitors to the Ombuds Office.
The Ombuds Office shall not have authority to adjudicate, impose remedies or sanctions, or to enforce or change policies or rules.
Individual ombuds shall avoid involvement in cases where there may be a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when an Ombuds’ private or professional interests, real or perceived, supersede or conflict with his or her dedication to the impartial and independent nature of the role of the Ombuds. When a real or perceived conflict exists, an Ombuds should take all steps necessary to disclose and/or avoid the conflict.
As described in Article VI of the U.S.R.R. (“Procedures for Conflict Resolution,” Section 2, “Informal Means of Dispute Resolution”), the Ombuds Office shall maintain a list of individuals willing to serve as mediators and with training and/or experience in dispute resolution, in consultation with others throughout the University community. The role of the Ombuds Office in formal mediation is limited to maintenance of this list and to providing assistance with locating an appropriate mediator. The Ombuds Office plays no other role in the mediation process.
All members of the constituencies served by the Ombuds Office shall have the right to consult with an Ombuds without reprisal. The Ombuds Office should work with the University of Kansas to create policies to protect visitors from reprisals.
Because of the independent nature of the Ombuds Office, and in congruence with IOA Standards of Practice, 2.3.: “The Ombudsman is a designated neutral reporting to the highest possible level of the organization and operating independent of ordinary line and staff structures. The Ombudsman should not report to nor be structurally affiliated with any compliance function of the organization,” the Ombuds Office shall report to the Provost (or other appropriate designee assigned by the Provost) and to University Senate for administrative and budgetary purposes only.
The Ombuds Office, in consultation with the Provost (or other appropriate designee assigned by the Provost) and University Senate, shall determine appropriate mechanisms for accountability, including regular evaluation of the Ombuds Office (see below, “VII. Evaluation of the Ombuds Office and Staff”). To fulfill its function, the Ombuds Office shall have a specific allocated budget, adequate and appropriate space, sufficient resources to meet operating needs, and continuing professional development of its staff.
Policies for staffing the University Ombuds Office are described under Article V, Section I of U.S.R.R., including the qualifications and terms of office for the University Ombuds and the Faculty Ombuds.
The Senate Executive Committee and the Provost (or other appropriate designee
assigned by the Provost) is responsible for conducting an annual evaluation of the Ombuds Office and its staff and reporting its findings to the Provost. The evaluation is conducted campus-wide and the survey instrument is located at http://surveys.ku.edu/Ombuds and is administered confidentially through the Office of Institutional Research and Planning (OIRP). Survey data will be summarized and sent to the Senate Executive Committee to be used in the annual evaluation of the University and Faculty Ombuds.
This document reflects current best practices in the ombuds profession. It may be revised as needed by the University of Kansas Ombuds Office, in consultation with the Office of the Provost and the University Senate Executive Committee.
Appendix A Professional Standards of Practice
Appendix B Professional Code of Ethics